- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
LMAO
Where do they get their data from? I doubt them. So does Gruber. https://daringfireball.net/2023/08/whats_the_deal_with_sensor_tower
I’d argue that the initial sign up week people should not be classified as “daily active users” Lots of people will check something out when it launches, I’d only start measuring actual usage after a month or two.
Yeah. Really those “DAU” numbers should be rolling average numbers per month, because there’s far too much user variability even week to week for any data to be reliable.
And 80 percent of over 100 million users is still 20-30m active users.
You’re bad at math (or more likely bad at wording things properly), 80% of 100million is 80 million…
The article says 80 percent of the users left. If you had more context, you would have got what I said.
I signed up to it from instagram to track my favorite epidemiologists and h5n1 only to discover it has no hashtag system to look up trending topics and most of my favorite epidemiologists aren’t even on it. So it’s worthless for even following COVID, avian flu, and probably every other news topic.
I thought it was explicitly anti-news and politics?
Ah well that would be why it’s completely pointless to me. Since all science is politicized now, I guess there is no reason to use it.