LMAO

  • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d argue that the initial sign up week people should not be classified as “daily active users” Lots of people will check something out when it launches, I’d only start measuring actual usage after a month or two.

    • empireOfLove@lemmy.oneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah. Really those “DAU” numbers should be rolling average numbers per month, because there’s far too much user variability even week to week for any data to be reliable.

      • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re bad at math (or more likely bad at wording things properly), 80% of 100million is 80 million…

        • StoicLime@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The article says 80 percent of the users left. If you had more context, you would have got what I said.

  • alternative_factor@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I signed up to it from instagram to track my favorite epidemiologists and h5n1 only to discover it has no hashtag system to look up trending topics and most of my favorite epidemiologists aren’t even on it. So it’s worthless for even following COVID, avian flu, and probably every other news topic.