The author may be a right-wing fellow. Nonetheless, the data he exposes are taken from official Mozilla docs.

    • monobot@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Is there any organization with totally claear finances and nothing strange anywhere?

      I haven’t seen one.

      This analysis means nothing since it is only one daya point.

      Like saying “you are worst human being because you are jaywalked yesterday”, there is no comparstion with other companies in smiliar business.

      Those are Google and Microsoft. Are they really better than Mozilla

  • biscuitsofdeath@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I read through it and I don’t know what the issue is?

    There seems to be an issue with Mozilla supporting diversity and inclusion. Also he has an issue with them having enough money to run the business. I.e. not living paycheck to paycheck.

    This article is nothing.

  • Gargari@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Great post. Does it matter if it’s right or left wing? How did you concluded that

    • peotr26@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lunduke is known to have been defending quite extremist (on the right side of the political spectrum) view point on certain subjects.

      As such, many people, me included, do not really like him.

        • darq@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ad hominem applies to arguments. The source of an argument does not affect the soundness of that argument.

          But it’s not a fallacy to question an overarching narrative based on the source. If a person keeps selectively choosing facts and twisting words to forward a specific narrative, it’s not fallacious to view what that person says with skepticism.

          Edit: Typo. Also changed “valid” to “sound”.

          • zephyrvs@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            ad hominem: in a way that is directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining.

            If you think his narrative is skewed and based on selectively chosen facts and twisted words, you could correct that.

    • mplewis@lemmy.globe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It absolutely matters. We need to consider that a right-wing actor is likely to exaggerate claims against an organization that is ostensibly socially-minded and represents anti-corporate interests, like Mozilla.

  • Gargari@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I moved from FF to Vivaldi (couldn’t find better browser, and form that to LibreWolf) due to how shitty the Mozilla Corp is. We need a fair player here but doesn’t seem that we gonna have anything anytime soon

    • Evkob@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Mozilla is shitty, so you’re opting for Google instead? That’s like saying the air quality is bad, and opting to jump in the ocean and drown.

        • Evkob@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh sorry, my reading comprehension is clearly lacking :P I’ve been eyeing LibreWolf for a while, but I’m mostly too lazy to switch my addons over.