• Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s also missing the pledge to not arrest people for eating bacon. Can we please get away from this ridiculous American style politics.

  • wewbull@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    What a weird article. It talks as if abortion is illegal in the UK. It is not illegal.

    I think it’s talking about at what point in the pregnancy abortion is allowed. I think most would agree that there is a point at which elective abortion should be off the table (e.g. would anybody argue for an abortion to be allowed the day before birth?). So the debate is about when that point is. A fair debate, but articles like this don’t help.

    • Flax@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Isn’t the law that you can only do it until the baby can survive outside of the womb? Which is around 20 weeks. Sounds pretty reasonable.

      • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        It is perfectly reasonable.

        But abortion is a big issue in the US and the UK media love to import US debate topics and try to make them relevant here.

        • Flax@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          BLM and ACAB were a similar thing. Yes, we do have our own problems here, especially in the MET Police, but it’s less of a systemic thing and moreso isolated incidents.

    • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      the only reason it would ever be performed a day before birth is because the pregnant person would die otherwise so yes there should be no limits on when it’s off the table

      • wewbull@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        There’s a reason I put the word “elective” in my post. Your hypothetical is not an elective situation. It’s an emergency procedure and so would not be covered by the legislation.

      • scratchee@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        So because there’s moral limits to when it would “ever be performed”, there should be no legal limits to when it would ever be performed? Surely by that logic we don’t need laws against murder either, after all, that would be immoral and sometimes you have to kill people in self defence, so murder laws just get in the way.

        This coming from a pro choice person, I do think there’s a good justification for allowing later abortions, but as the previous poster said, it’s not helpful to pretend there’s no complexity or that there should be no limits at all.