• technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The usual delusional propaganda. USA is not letting it “play out”. USA is actively arming and funding genocide and terrorism in several countries.

    • fukhueson@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/reuters/

      Overall, we rate Reuters Least Biased based on objective reporting and Very High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information with minimal bias and a clean fact check record. (7/10/2016) Updated (M. Huitsing 10/10/2024)

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia%3AReliable_sources%2FPerennial_sources

      Reuters is a news agency. There is consensus that Reuters is generally reliable. Syndicated reports from Reuters that are published in other sources are also considered generally reliable. Press releases published by Reuters are not automatically reliable.

      • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        The US is supplying the bombs that are being used to indescriminantly murder civilians though.

          • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            yeah it is, it’s uncritically reporting what the administration is saying, justifying the war even, despite the fact that they obviously control the reins on this mad dog - they could cut off weapons at any time.

            The US strategy has not changed despite the headline, it has always been to let the atrocities play out

            • fukhueson@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              I see no justifications of the war in the article. Sounds like the issue is that it doesn’t say the things you’d prefer?

              • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                2 months ago

                The administration is saying the justifications, the stenographers of empire are the ones uncritically reporting them.

                Do you really need me to spell it out?

                Now, U.S. officials have dropped their calls for a ceasefire, arguing that circumstances have changed. “We do support Israel launching these incursions to degrade Hezbollah’s infrastructure so ultimately we can get a diplomatic resolution,” State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller told a press briefing earlier this week. The course change reflects conflicting U.S. goals - containing the ever-growing Middle East conflict while also severely weakening Iran-backed Hezbollah.

                The new approach is both practical and risky.

                We love a practical warmonger 🤩🤩🤩

                • fukhueson@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  The article is not justifying the war, and I won’t entertain unsourced speculation as though it is fact. It is not propaganda.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s propaganda by the US government, not by Reuters. Reuters is accurately reporting the US government’s stated position.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Okay after taking another look at the article it’s not even propaganda. The US will let Israel fight Hezbollah with no change in US-Israeli relations. That’s the only possible meaning of “let the conflict play out” here. Their reporting isn’t misleading in any way.

      • njm1314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Do you think we aren’t involved in this? Do you think the people whose parents whose children whose brothers whose sisters whose family are being killed by American bombs are going to think that?

  • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Aaron David Miller, a former U.S. Middle East negotiator, said Washington had little hope of restraining Israel and saw potential benefits in the operation.

    Washington has little desire to restrain Israel, or else it would have stopped sending weapons a year ago. This can be ended with a phone call; we know because it’s been done before: NYT, 1982: Reagan Demands End to Attacks in A Blunt Telephone Call to Begin

    Citations Needed podcast:

    • 2017: Episode 13: The Always Stumbling US Empire: “Stumbling”, “sliding”, “drawn into” war––the media frequently assumes the US is bumbling its way around the world. The idea that the United States operates in “good faith” is taken for granted for most of the American press while war is always portrayed as something that happens to the US, not something it seeks out.
    • 2021: News Brief - Colin Powell: Stumbling Empire Personified: In this News Brief, we recap the recap of Powell’s life, from the handwringing over his Iraq War UN speech to the erasure of his role in covering up My Lai massacre to training rightwing death squads in Central America and the central importance of “Good Intentions” when venerating our beloved, bipartisan war-makers.