• rand_alpha19@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I think I’ve landed on Flatpak as my favourite between Snap, Flatpak, and AppImage. AppImage, when it works, is nice though. Snaps are just kind of inconvenient (auto-updates are a no for me) and bloated and the things Canonical are doing as an organization put a bad taste in my mouth.

  • NateNate60@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Unpopular opinion: snap is not so bad and genuinely useful for many things

    I would rather have a snap than building from source or use some tar.gz archive with a sketchy install script

    • m4m4m4m4@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 minutes ago

      some tar.gz archive with a sketchy install script

      I just can’t… like I’m old and that’s wh I still can’t wrap my head around how we went full circle from “./configure && make & make install scripts are almost the de facto way to install software in linux” to “a sketchy install script”. We’re living interesting times at Linux