Obligatory 'Fuck John Deere".

All of them are considered in tandem, not individually.

Considering that OpenAI is making a commercial profit from developing its ML models

They are losing money during development (all those GPUs are not free and running them costs a lot of energy), they are making the money after it’s trained. Just factual inaccuracy.

And being used for commercial purpose is not automatic rejection. Take YouTube, where fair use comes up constantly. Almost all the cases are for commercial purpose, but most qualify under fair use.

#3 also because the model usually ingests the entire work, not just part of it.

While they are trained on full works, the used work in the result is different. Probably minimal considering the size of the models. The fact that some courts already ruled that “AI” works can’t be copyrighted gives weight to the argument that it’s a unique work.

It’s very hard to argue that “AI” generated is different from someone looking at the original and making a copy by hand. And since the latter is allowed, by the same token is the former.

They were one of the first to go.

I think my workplace would be more concerned about the fact that their own sex toy shopping is tracked than the fact that I use sex toys.

But I marked it as NSFW anyway.

Which part do you find NSFW?

Both things can be true. And in this case they are.

Fucking pay them or write them yourselves.

This. Refactoring the whole code is insanely time intensive, even if developers know multiple languages. All these critical components you rely on, you use without any compensation or support and then dare to complain it’s not to your security standards. Fix it, or pay for it to be fixed.

It really depends on each person’s threat model. But there are a few things everyone would benefit from. Like VPN, email aliasing, password manager, 2FA/MFA. They don’t have any convenience cost and in most cases make your life easier.

If you are interested in learning more:

• https://www.privacyguides.org
• https://thenewoil.org/en/guides/prologue/
• https://freedom.press/training/
• https://anonymousplanet.org/guide.html

I was being factual. Unless you can dispute anything I said?

There is also Vivaldi (based on Chromium/Blink) which is employee owned, but the choices are shrinking.

Mozilla Foundation is still non-profit, but Mozilla Corporation is not. And while they claim to operate by Mozilla Manifesto, it’s non-binding and has been broken multiple times. Remember Pocket and their promise to open source it?

Firefox own data disproves your statement. https://data.firefox.com/dashboard/user-activity

It’s internal. They are becoming irrelevant (their browser market share have been shrinking for years now), so they are jumping all the new hype trends now. They literally just became an ad company. We have Google, Apple, Brave and Mozilla all being an ad companies that produce browsers.

If you read the blog post you would know there are 0 mentions of VPNs there. VPNs have very limited purpose, and it’s just a small tool in the arsenal of privacy.

Follow up story to https://lemmy.zip/post/17888710

They have an issue about it https://codeberg.org/swiso/website/issues/255 from 2 weeks ago.

Europe is moving away from the track gauge used by Russia/Belarus, so it’s less of a factor now. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans-European_Transport_Network

RCS doesn’t support encryption natively. Google only has proprietary encryption for Messages app.

This is probably out of topic of this community, so just downvote it if you find it not interesting.

That looks like an interruption.

You should use uBlock Origin anyway, for your own safety. Ads is one of the biggest vector for malware these days.

Wartime unity. And while less radical parts of the government stopped supporting him, he joined with radical parts to stay in power while compromising on everything he previously said he will never accept.