Lemmy.zip admin
Contact me via hello@lemmy.zip
Still can’t really hold them liable unless they deliberately sold a weapon to someone who legally was prohibited from having a weapon.
That’s a very American point of view though - America isn’t holding those who create/sell tools that do bad things to account. If gun manufacturers were held responsible for how the things they created were used, you can bet anything suddenly they’d be hell of lot safer. Which is the exact same point about AI.
(Obviously not holding manufacturers/sellers to account is not an America-only issue, but this article is about AI and the USA so that’s the example I’m using.)
The bigger question is why did someone feel the need to kill others?
As a non-American, I think the general question is why on earth does the general public need semi-automatic weapons. Or really, any weapons.
Yes, this, not the school.
Well the American way is not to hold the company accountable, I.e. school shootings, so yeah.
I switched to an amd card not that long ago so I could use wayland.
Way too many issues, games being jittery, crashing, graphical effects with it to continue trying. I ended up switching back to x after a couple of days and then instead went for an amd card for the wayland benefits.
Considering the mass exodus of Dr’s abroad, who exactly do they expect to do this. The only way to achieve this is to improve conditions, pay, and invest in the training of new Dr’s.
Thank goodness for that, such a pain in games like overcooked
Nice, I’d seen you’d stopped a while ago but I’ll look at hosting it if it’s back alive.
It has
Or do you have an existing project that requires additional effort to enable further development?
So I assume the Lemmy devs should be good to reapply.
I would fully suggest trying the demo if you haven’t. It’s on steam. Took me about 40 mins to do both demo bits, but you can run around the whole ship.
I live in hope it will live up to the expectations. But I am fully aware I could be throwing my money away.
I really enjoyed the demo, enough to back the kickstarter which I haven’t done for years.
I played a ton of ST:bridge crew so looking for something to scratch that itch.
Here’s a handy site to check your federation status: https://phiresky.github.io/lemmy-federation-state/site?domain=social.packetloss.gg
It looks like all the sites are lagging, which can sometimes mean there is an issue. What’s the specs of the server? Can you try restarting it and seeing if that helps?
There are issues for servers hosted in places like Australia because of the latency in communicating with .world due to how big it is and how much data it sends because of this.
Pop got me into Linux in July 2021 (i switched the same time as the steamdeck was announced) and I ran Pop for a good two and a half years. Great distro.
Now I’m on EndeavourOS, but it was Pop that helped me make the transition.
Finally. Having 4 bile titans and 30 chargers chasing you around the map along with constant bug spawns gets a bit much when I dont have that much time to play.
Always take a Recoilless Rifle so will be glad to actually feel like I’m helping instead of chipping away at armor.
Not directly, but you can go to browse.feddit.de and type the instance into the search bar to get a list of communities
I’ve seen a few comments about UI on lemmy and just wanted to put it out there that we also have these interfaces you can use:
old.lemmy.zip and m.lemmy.zip - and while yes usually the m denotes a mobile interface but it also works really well on desktop/tablet if you don’t like the usual lemmy interface :)
Hey, lemmy.zip admin here - what you’re seeing is a side effect of how lemmy works vs some of the stuff we do on lemmy.zip to promote communities using a tool called Lemmy Federate - basically all our communities are federated out to 27 other instances and the comments etc should pull through without issue there (reddthat, feddit uk, midwest.social etc - full list is here (currently [email protected] is at the top) - the other instances (lemmy.ml, lemmy.world, lemm.ee etc) don’t actually know about the community because no one from those instances has subscribed, so no information is given to those instances UNTIL someone subscribes or searches it for the first time on that instance, at which point its a blank slate - its the same with users, hence why neon_carnivores comment might not show on other instances - its because they’re not aware of them as a user on lemmy.zip yet. It should balance out over time as more instances become aware of the community.
You can see live federation stats for lemmy.zip here.
PS - thats a really terrible explanation from me about federation on lemmy there but tl;dr its how federation on lemmy works - it just takes time until a few users are subscribed from each instance, then its good to go.
ETA - i can see upvotes pulling through properly too now on lemmy.ml as i upvote or downvote on lemmy.zip so federation going forwards should work fine…
Most other social networks allow users to select whether they are reporting a violation of community rules, or site rules as whole.
Why not take this approach to simplify it then?
Asking the user to specify who they think should receive a report feels like it will add confusion (not to mention is subjective anyway), and could create delays in responding to important stuff if the user picks the “wrong” option. If a user picks the mod option on csam report then it might get missed by an admin? At least the option between “this community” or “site rules” is a bit clearer.
This is to prevent cases of admins accidentally preventing mods from moderating according to their own community rules
As an admin I should be able to respond to a mod report on a community if I’m there first and its urgent, i.e. csam. This is a policy/discussion point between mods and admins on any given instance and shouldn’t be enforced in the software. Separation for clarity’s sake is fine, I even encourage that as I don’t tend to touch a report for a community anyway as it stands, but I should be able to mark a report complete if I have dealt with it. Otherwise I’m just going to go to the post and sort it out anyway, so its just adding complexity.
Admins can still always explicitly take over communities by making themselves mods, in this way, they are able to handle mod reports for any abandoned communities, etc
Barriers/extra steps to administration is not the way forward here. Continuing with Admins being able to mark reports resolved just makes sense.
Alternatively, we could make reporting even more granular. It would be possible to allow users to select only a specific instances admins as the intended report audience, for example.
No. This is a step backwards in transparency and moderation efforts. Granularity and more options is not always a good thing. If you’ve ever had the misfortune of using Meta’s report functionality you’ll know how overly complex and frustrating their report system is to use with all their “granularity”.
Simplicity of use and getting a report to someone who can do something about it quickly should always be the priority, adding options and functionality should be secondary and support this. If you don’t want to be stepping on moderators toes, make that clear in your guidelines and processes.
I am legally on the hook for content on my instance, not the moderators, and proposing changes that make it harder to be an admin is a touch annoying.
To add: I would suggest thinking about expanding this to notify the user a report has been dealt with/resolved, optionally including rationale, because that feedback element can sometimes be lacking.
I cant praise this game enough, having an absolute blast with it. Was even happy to play through the missions knowing i wouldnt get rewarded for them, it was just that much fun.
I haven’t stopped playing Helldivers 2 since release. It’s amazing. I’ve also had no issues/crashes on linux unlike my friends on windows, so my smugness level is at 1000.
Congrats & happy birthday guys!