• PonyOfWar@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    3 days ago

    Incidentally that’s also the effect of not voting for the lesser evil, you can just cut out the two steps in the middle then.

    • Saleh@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      So if you don’t vote for the lesser evil it gets salty and joins the evil? Yeah i am not voting for that psycho manipulating abusive shit.

      • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        So if you don’t vote for the lesser evil it gets salty and joins the evil?

        Not quite. If you don’t vote for the lesser evil, it loses influence, which means the greater evil has it easier to shift things over in their direction and control the narrative. They’ve won after all, so clearly that’s what the voters want. The lesser evil will take cues from this.

        (It should also be said that this whole meme only really applies to shitty 2-party systems. In a proper parliamentary democracy, you have more realististic choices than “greater evil” and “lesser evil” and don’t have to play this stupid game at all.)

        • tempest@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          The two party System is more a consequence of first past the post than the system they are voted into.

          If you look at Canada as an example in the last 30 years the parties on the right have amalgamated and have been rewarded for it as the vote splitting on the left is what gets them elected. It’s just a matter of time until the left follow suit and then 🎉 two party system.

        • Saleh@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          The same shit happens in systems with more than two parties. You also have the problem to think about rallying behind the main party on the left or right side vs. one that is closer to your ideals but probably wont become part of the government coalition. In Germany, where i am from, we had 12 out of 16 years under Merkel with a “big coalition” of the conservative CDU and the social democrat SPD. All that happened was the SPD moving more and more to the right. Now we had a coalition that was supposedly progressive but collapsed hard as well as the Green party and liberal party FDP also moving strongly to the right. We now in 2024 have policies among the supposed center/center-left that used to be fringe far right by German standards. This is why voting “tactically” or for “the lesser evil” fails. It gives a false sense of what is demanded by the people.

          Also for the narrative control just take the win of Biden in 2020 as a counter example. Despite Trump holding office the Dems managed to win.

          • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            I’m also from Germany and I don’t think it’s a similar situation at all. In our system, it’s absolutely possible and doable for a new party to arise and gain influence. You don’t have to vote for the lesser evil, you can find a party that actually suits you and there is a realistic shot of getting it elected if enough people want it to happen. We’ve gotten 2 new parties in parliament over the last decade (I don’t like either of them, but that’s beside the point). And yes, we have a general shift to the right in Germany as well, but that’s more due to the actual attitudes of the population, a generally weak left and things like Russian influence. Contrary to the US, voters can absolutely reverse that trend though.

            In a system like the US, that’s almost impossible. Let’s say the democrats split up into left-wing democrats and right-wing democrats. Half of the voter base goes to either party, so 25% of the population votes for each. However, elections are “first past the post”, so even if the left gained a lot of voters and reached, say, 35%, it will be a total victory for the Republican party. Any party that can’t get an absolute majority of votes is powerless. The momentum for a new party to get to power would have to be insane.

            Also for the narrative control just take the win of Biden in 2020 as a counter example. Despite Trump holding office the Dems managed to win.

            Well, yes, but pretty much exclusively by running on a lesser evil “We’re not Trump” platform. Had the Trump presidency never happened, it could have been way more about actual policy.

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Then they don’t need to worry about your vote and are stuck competing for the remaining voters

        • Saleh@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Well, they would get my vote if they changed their policies and behaviour. If you vote them no matter what they dont have to fight for it. (Note i am not a US citizen but the same principles apply. I have similar dissapointment with the formerly progressive parties in my country moving to the right)

          And we can also observe this empirically with the current election. The Dems were so tone deaf that they thought to compete over Reps not too happy with Trump, fielding people like Dick fucking Cheney as their advocates. Meanwhile they lost a lot of votes they expected to just have secure because they expected the voters to be blindly loyal hence irrelevant to their strategy.