eleitl@lemm.eeM to

Collapse@lemm.ee · 2 days ago

Debunking Degrowth, part II (2022)

gl-10190.medium.com

4

8

Debunking Degrowth, part II (2022)

gl-10190.medium.com

eleitl@lemm.eeM to

Collapse@lemm.ee · 2 days ago

4

Debunking Degrowth, part II

gl-10190.medium.com

“Degrowth” doesn’t make any sense, harmful even, so why don’t we wise up and stop using it? I’ll try and explain...

Chat

Nakoichi [they/them]@hexbear.net
link
fedilink
English
arrow-up
3
arrow-down
1·
2 days ago
This is semantic drivel. Degrowth has very concrete meaning in marxist terms. It is a shorthand for undoing the decades of horrific damage done to the environment for extractive profiteering.

Collapse@lemm.ee

collapse@lemm.ee

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

This is the place for discussing the potential collapse of modern civilization and the environment.

Collapse, in this context, refers to the significant loss of an established level or complexity towards a much simpler state. It can occur differently within many areas, orderly or chaotically, and be willing or unwilling. It does not necessarily imply human extinction or a singular, global event. Although, the longer the duration, the more it resembles a ‘decline’ instead of collapse.

RULES

1 - Remember the human

2 - Link posts should come from a reputable source

3 - All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith.

4 - No low effort, high volume and low relevance posts.

Related lemmys:

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

47 users / day
169 users / week
507 users / month
782 users / 6 months
1 local subscriber
362 subscribers
116 Posts
137 Comments
Modlog