• LifeOfChance@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Honestly, The government isn’t protecting our data anyways so it really doesn’t matter. Amazon has had yet another massive breach but no worries the government is sitting idly by. Not a single action will be taken even though this happens all the time. No penalty means no reason to change.

    • vulture_god@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Is this the Amazon breach you’re talking about?

      https://www.forbes.com/sites/larsdaniel/2024/11/11/amazon-confirms-data-breach-exposed-2800000-lines-of-employee-data/

      I hadn’t heard of it, and I usually follow this stuff pretty closely. FWIW, in this case, it appears that the data was employee data from a third party vendor’s systems:

      The exposed Amazon dataset includes employee work contact information, email addresses, desk phone numbers, and building locations. While Amazon spokesperson Adam Montgomery confirmed the breach, he emphasized in a statement to TechCrunch that core Amazon and Amazon Web Services, or AWS, systems remained secure.

      People misconfigure AWS resources all the time, so it is definitely true that data stored by Amazon leaks out from time to time, although they don’t have much culpability in these cases.

    • mxcory@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Yeah, if the government really cared, they would be pushing privacy laws instead of trying to ban a platform.

      • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Yeah…but it’s much easier to get elected with "ChInA bAd!”

        Then “We need a nuanced approach to privacy and social media.”

      • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        that platform is being banned because there are very limited privacy laws and the platform doesn’t even comply with those. all theyhad to do is start a US front company with a data center, host all collected user data there and deny all data center access to the foreign parent company.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              The only articles I saw were for headcount data. Literally just confirming the number of users. They embarked on an entire project for it and then the goal posts were taken off the field.