• UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Making stuff up?

    you added 17 edits and made your arguemt 600% longer <–Lie your argument changed completely <-- Lie

    And I show you how I normally type cause I got big fingers and toye fast and I get in trouble. I go back to fix errors and get in trouble. There’s no winnignwith you

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      No, it’s not a lie. It’s a very clear comical exaggeration for humouristic purposes, because there’s SEVERAL “edit” labels you’ve added to the original, which everyone can see.

      I added the ‘edits’ immediately after I posted. Went back after starting to argue with you cause I realized I made some grammatical errors cause I went back to reread what I wrote.

      You added them 20 minutes later. I replied to you 10 minutes later.

      You added several sentences. You didn’t just “fix typos”.

      I also fixed typos after proofreading. Takes a whole of twenty seconds as you can see.

      • UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 hours ago

        No. There are 3 edits inadded. Not seventeen. I added all my thoughts immediately. And came back to clarify and fix typos after cause I knew it was a controversial top comment. Especially since it was getting traction immediately.

        Congrats on being better technically. Want and award?

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          No. There are 3 edits inadded. Not seventeen.

          #No, it’s not a lie. It’s a very clear comical exaggeration for humouristic purposes, because there’s SEVERAL “edit” labels you’ve added to the original, which everyone can see.

          Hope you can see that better now than in the previous comment.

          I added all my thoughts immediately.

          Not before I had already replied to you.

            • Dasus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 hours ago

              I do know what to tell you.

              You wrote a comment, I read it, replied it to it, and whilst I was replying to it, you started editing it, then I posted my comment and then you posted your edit.

              Nothing weird about it. And still, you don’t say you suffered from moobs, do you? So how is me bringing that up me calling you fat just for pointing out that more cis males have gender affirming care than trans people, statistically? You were wrong to say I was calling you fat, because I wasn’t. But you can’t say “I was mistaken in thinking you called me fat.”

              “It didn’t say anything about surgeries”

              You might as well have been talking about pasta in general and then start crying when I bring up spaghetti, saying “I was talking about pasta, it has nothing to do with spaghetti!” One is a subcategory of the other. “Gender affirming care” includes within it gender affirming surgeries.

              And how exactly would you go about getting a bigger dick without a surgery, pray tell?

                • Dasus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  How far in life do you think you’ll get if you can’t swallow your pride enough to say “I’m sorry, I made a mistake” , online, to a stranger.

                  In any sort of business setting you’re gonna have to do that a lot.

                  I never called you fat. You said I did. You were wrong. I’d like an apology.

                  You were talking about gender affirming care, part of which is gender affirming surgeries, which is why I informed you of the fact that most of those are for cis males. I prefaced it with “FYI”. As in, I was informing you of a thing that’s related, not cooking up personal insults.

                  And again, I don’t know how you imagine one could get a bigger penis if not surgically? You haven’t wasted your moneys on those advertisemts in emails promising “inches in weeks”? I don’t think you should. They’re not too trustworthy as companies, I’ve heard.