• tired_n_bored@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    After reading these reports of intensified fingerprinting I decided to block all scripts on my browser using uBlock. Can’t do much regarding the IP tho

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      Man, I had gaming scheduled for this weekend. I guess I gotta move up my plan to backup everything and switch over to GrapheneOS.

      • Darorad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Its a pretty easy switch and has some nice perks like disabling the software restictions on the USB C port so you can actually hook up displays

            • Optional@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              It’s possible, but a huge PITA. Learning how to do it, that is. Once you know all the magic incantations and have your potions and elixirs available, it’s easy enough.

              Most of the “how to” guides don’t mention all the little crap you need to know so it takes a lot of trolling through forums to find why this next step isn’t working.

              • krash@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                I have a galaxy phone but haven’t pursued the idea of installing grapheneOS on it as I thought it would be impossible. Please share you arcane knowledge of the unholy incarnations.

          • truxnell@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            I’ve been daily driving bazzite for a few months, I would highly recommend you give it a distro hop for a bit to see if it fits you. The main downside is getting used to the atomic mindset and changing how you install your tooling

            • Telorand@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              I actually have it on a laptop, because I wanted something virtually bulletproof that my SO could have that just works. No worrying about broken configs or leftover cruft.

              Just undecided if I want it on my main desktop. I’ve had a few minor but annoying issues with it, though nothing unworkable. Ricing is sometimes problematic, and that’s something I enjoy. I really like the build process, though, and how you can downstream your own version, and I like ostree backups (plus I can’t wait for bootc).

        • Optional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          gimme a decent rom guaranteed to work with my six-year-old unsupported hardware

    • _lilith@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      What service provider are you using with Graphene? I want to de google but it seems a wasted effort when I have FI

    • unhrpetby@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Last I recall, Vanadium lags behind customized-Firefox in privacy features, and even more behind the Tor Browser.

      Having a tool like Noscript is absolutely necessary, with today’s browsers, if you want to fight fingerprinting.

  • nyankas@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I unfortunately can’t really see how a browser could still be nice to use and properly resist fingerprinting.

    The site https://amiunique.org/fingerprint tries to fingerprint your browser and lists the used attributes along with their uniqueness within their dataset. And while a browser could pretty reliably lie about its User Agent or Platform, it’s often just necessary for a modern website to know, for example, what your view-port’s resolution is or what kind of audio/video codecs your device supports. Going through my own results, I’d say combining these necessary data points is probably enough to identify me, even though I’m pretty privacy-conscious.

    Maybe I’m overly pessimistic, but I think preventing fingerprinting would need a regulatory instead of a technical solution. Unfortunately that doesn’t seem very likely anytime soon.

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      There are extentions for Firefox that randomise most of that. They add random supported codecs for example, enough to make it believable, not enough to make it a unique combination.
      It’s not perfect, nothing is, but it seems to be good enough.

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Browser?

      Lol they own Android…it’s the entire os. They’re fingerprinting every android phone.

    • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’d say combining these necessary data points is probably enough to identify me

      The EFF has had a couple of websites that would profile you on exactly this data, so you’re completely correct in that even the basic normal required metadata is more than enough to identify you pretty well.

      coveryourtracks.eff.org is where it’s living now, and a quick glance shows that just using browser capabilities and such is absolutely enough to identify me.

    • rainrain@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’ve been using browsers for a couple of decades without digital fingerprinting and it’s nice enough for me. I see no need to make it nicer.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Such as?

        Every browser can be fingerprinted, even Tor browser, which goes out of its way to resist fingerprinting. The only way to really avoid fingerprinting is to not use JavaScript, which is extremely limiting.

  • kbal@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Perhaps this will motivate makers of web browsers to finally get serious about making fingerprinting less easy. Looking at you, Mozilla.

      • shininghero@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yes, but with a few caveats. Last time I used the ‘Resist Fingerprinting’ option, it made window resizing funky and some sites flat out rendered wrong.
        It needs some polish and some user controls.

        • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          2 days ago

          That’s the tradeoff you have to make. Your window size is a good fingerprint, so spoofing the size makes sense. But websites that need to window size for legitimate reasons are breaking.

        • Eheran@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          How else could it be? The window size directly identifies you AND determines the page layout.