ALostInquirer@lemm.ee to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 4 days agoWhat have you viewed as the "least bad" among employers when looking for work?message-squaremessage-square44fedilinkarrow-up159arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up159arrow-down1message-squareWhat have you viewed as the "least bad" among employers when looking for work?ALostInquirer@lemm.ee to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 4 days agomessage-square44fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarePieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down3·2 days agoNo acronym is universal. You can overload acronyms with dozens of different meanings. But still, IC is common as individual contributor. Case in point: Microsoft uses it as a filter on their career site. Not exactly a small company…
minus-squaremy_hat_stinks@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·2 days agoAnd it’s differentiated from IC meaning Independent Contractor by…? No, corporate jargon is stupid and saying it’s acceptable because a big corp uses corporate jargon is even stupider.
minus-squarePieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 day agoYou do know that corporations also use terms like “lol”, “aka” or even “ic” meaning integrated circuits.
No acronym is universal.
You can overload acronyms with dozens of different meanings.
But still, IC is common as individual contributor. Case in point: Microsoft uses it as a filter on their career site. Not exactly a small company…
And it’s differentiated from IC meaning Independent Contractor by…?
No, corporate jargon is stupid and saying it’s acceptable because a big corp uses corporate jargon is even stupider.
You do know that corporations also use terms like “lol”, “aka” or even “ic” meaning integrated circuits.