You’re only able to choose two options, how is that democracy? I thought democracy was about being able to choose anyone you think is suitable to be a leader, not one of two pre-selected people. At that point, it’s not much different to a one-party system, just with two people rather than only one person.

  • vvilld@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I appreciate your optimism, but I do not share it and have seen no evidence to support it.

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I mean maine is the only state with possibly enough time to possibly have any effect. Remember that the senate only turns over every 6 years for a position. They have two senators and two reps and one is independent, but that was the case before. What we see there is incumbents continuing to win but given their reps I don’t see this as surprising. It will make a bigger difference when its more contested. If it came to illinois it would give duckworth difficulties because of her military and security voting. Honestly given our executive ignoring the courts im not sure if its going to matter much unless we get back to a somewhat working system in general.

      • vvilld@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Completely agree on that last point. I don’t really expect we’ll see completely fair and open elections in this country for a while, if ever again.