merridew@feddit.uk to United Kingdom@feddit.ukEnglish · 11 months agoUlez: More than 300 cameras damaged or stolen in four monthswww.bbc.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up129arrow-down10
arrow-up129arrow-down1external-linkUlez: More than 300 cameras damaged or stolen in four monthswww.bbc.co.ukmerridew@feddit.uk to United Kingdom@feddit.ukEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square37fedilink
minus-squareTreczoks@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·11 months agoThat could be more easily achieved by increasing the taxes on polluting cars in general. There is no need for cameras at every corner.
minus-squareNuPNuA@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·11 months agoExcept that’s it only applies to London, any change to vehicle tax would have to come from central government.
minus-squareTreczoks@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up4·11 months agoLess fuel-wasting cars anywhere would be a win-win over CCTV everywhere.
minus-squareHikuNoir@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·edit-210 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squareCookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·11 months agoOr just forbidding them in general… But no, cameras! The awnser for all your Surveillance Climate Change questions. This is like being against encryption of private messages because pedophiles could use that…
That could be more easily achieved by increasing the taxes on polluting cars in general. There is no need for cameras at every corner.
Except that’s it only applies to London, any change to vehicle tax would have to come from central government.
Less fuel-wasting cars anywhere would be a win-win over CCTV everywhere.
deleted by creator
Or just forbidding them in general… But no, cameras! The awnser for all your
SurveillanceClimate Change questions.This is like being against encryption of private messages because pedophiles could use that…