• kevin@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep, you send me html, my browser can interpret it any way that I want it to. If I want to ignore all of the image and script tags, I can. I don’t need Chrome or even Chromium. As Stallman says, you should know what is running on your system.

      • baldingpudenda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        We need to go back to html and css. Using an ad blocker and noscript literally breaks webpages. I just want to read the article! You know the content ppl actually come for

      • voidMainVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That doesn’t mean his strstegy and approach is good.

        Who cares? Whether or not Stallman is a likeable person isn’t what’s important. His ideas are.

      • Smoogy@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        But that’s also not private as has been claimed as a reason to go FF. The only reason to use FF is only to not use chrome. Not for all the reasons that chrome is bad.

        • zucky@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Tor Browser, LibreWolf, and Arkenfox JS are the most secure and private browsers you can get and they’re all based on Firefox. If they’re not private enough for you, I don’t know what is

  • artaxthehappyhorse@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ah yes, 2023. The year I wore a pirate hat and touched more grass. Soon they’ll be bribing the govt to make going outside illegal.

  • raidenfox@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    tbh I’m just tired of all of this, we can’t have nice things, ever… Every fucking thing in this world is being swallowed by corporate greed. Every service there’s a catch, and I’m getting mad with it, things aren’t made to serve their purpose, they only exist to make money and more money for people who already have infinite money, it’s frustrating. Things need to change or everything is going to collapse… fuck companies, fuck billionaires, fuck stocks, fuck all of this

  • IntentionallyAnon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    DRM is stupid because it interferes with paying customers and isn’t effective. If there’s a will there’s a way

    • limecool@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That may be true on desktop. But, unfortunately, the mobile app is way behind chromium. From being unresponsive, to outright buggy. It’s not a good experince. It’s been 2 years since the rewrite but it’s not getting much better or even close to fixing most of its issue. Meaning, using firefox on android is a handicap on yourself.

  • Zinggi57@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think a lot of people here don’t understand the danger of this fully and dismiss it with “Just use Firefox, problem solved”.
    Unfortunately, once this becomes widely available, that is once Chrome ships it, websites will start to use it.
    Maybe Amazon will just not sell to you anymore when you’re browsing with Firefox?
    Maybe YouTube wont serve any videos if you’re using Linux?
    Your bank will certainly implement this and only allow Windows 11 with Edge or some shit like that.
    Once this is implemented, we will all suffer, even if we’re using better alternatives right now.

    • Ember Ushi@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Your bank will certainly implement this

      My brother in Christ, it was 2020 before my bank supported passwords longer than 8 characters. We have 30 or 40 years before we need to worry about the banks.

  • bad_alloc@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    We saw the mass adoption of the internet, which before was mostly used by a small group of techies. Now we might be heading to a split: The mass walled garden and a separate smaller but free internet.

    • They want to implement a “feature” so websites only load for you, if your browser, OS and hardware are deemed “trustworthy” aka you load every ad and malware that the website wants to shove down your throat.

  • NorthWestWind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I recently played Hacknet, a hacking game published in 2015. That game talks a LOT about being tracked on the Internet, telling you to delete logs and some IP address data in file headers.

    I think it’s becoming reality.

    • ArtDragon38@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The game tells you to delete the logs on servers because computers can track all incoming requests, which can be a problem when you are doing nefarious actions and looking through confidentional infornation. Tracking who is accessing a computer/server and why has been a common practice, especially for buisnesses.

      You also don’t actually need to delete the logs while playing. There are only 1 or 2 minor moments where there is a consequence for not doing that, and in those cases a fork bomb is also needed (to prevent leaving a disconnect log).

      The actual scary part of the game is (SPOILERS) a big tech company developing a massive 0-day exploit and wanting to monopolize the patch for it.

    • Knusper@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Meta’s new Threads network is supposed to start federating via ActivityPub at some point.

      • moonmeow@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        well, i guess some silver lining is that threads is basically non-existent after its launch. The serious and place to be instances will block threads. If i need to go see something on threads i’ll join an instance that allows it, but doubt i’d ever bother.

        Didn’t even bother checking it out.

  • kool_newt@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The rulers figured out the internet is too dangerous to their power. They thought they could control it and us, and they did for a long time, but it’s not working anymore. Now they are cracking down on our ability to communicate, to prevent ideas from spreading and taking hold that they cannot tolerate.

    • ImOnADiet@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      ? They’re just following the end game of capitalism, they’re trying to squeeze every last bit of profit out of the internet that they can, it has nothing to do with the internet “threatening” power, they already took care of that with all of the spying laws they passed when the internet started getting popular

      • kool_newt@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe, but capitalism has been the case the entire time, why is social media globally melting down in 2023?

        Also, spying laws are not necessarily effective at containing the spread of ideas.

        • ImOnADiet@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          interest rate hikes, VCs are demanding their money back and companies are scrambling to become profitable/more profitable.

          Edit: forgot to address the other point, they don’t really care about us spreading ideas as long as we don’t actually threaten their power. There is absolutely 0 threat of a socialist revolution anywhere in the west right now

      • kool_newt@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh my bad, obviously there are no ultra wealthy people with power boners able to use their fortunes to get their way.