I understand that sharing video, photos, documents etc. is relatively safe because the data is not executed in the processor as instructions. How come people are willing to download and install pirated software though? How can one be confident that it does not contain malicious addons? Are people just don’t know the risks? Or are there protection mechanisms that I am missing? I mean since the software is usually cracked there is not much use in comparing checksums with the originals, is it?

  • pre@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Worth noting that paying for a license for software doesn’t stop it being spying malware either. In fact the pirate versions often take out the spying and the reporting-to-homebase that proprietary software does.

    The photoshop that phones home to check a license is arguably more malicious than the pirate version that has been cracked so it doesn’t do that.

    • alexg_k@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Good and valid point. I use opensource software wherever I can.

      Though paid software is not going to encrypt your data for ransom or use a keylogger to steal bitcoin (yet).

      • NullGator@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        There was an antivirus that was caught running a bitcoin miner in the background tbf. If memory serves it was Norton?

  • Deathcrow@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    How come people are willing to download and install pirated software though?

    You can just remove “priated” from that statement and come to the same conclusions. Considering the amount of bugs, backdoors and 0-day exploits distributed via official software I sometimes wonder why people execute proprietary, closed source programs at all.

    An no, “reputable” companies mean nothing, just look at Microsoft clowning around with their signing keys.

  • Gush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    If i were to pay for an AutoCAD license , it would be over 200$ A MONTH

    • Overzeetop@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      What kind of cheap-ass, stripped down AutoDesk suite are you getting for $200/mo. Last I checked, the architectural suite was north of $4500/yr.

  • Mothra@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s one of those high-risk, high-returns case scenarios. You gamble. If you succeed, you will be saving some buck. Some software licences can be very, very expensive.

    There is no way of knowing the answer to your questions. You just use your intuition and take a leap of faith.

    • dejalynn@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Some software licences can be very, very expensive.

      When I was in art school in the early 2000’s, I worked with computer controlled weaving looms. The program for drafting patterns and running the AVL Compu Dobby on the loom was free to download. In order to use it, though, you had to have a $3000 usb key.

        • dejalynn@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          The part that hurt was the ancient Mac II that ran the loom. When I encountered the Y2K bug on it, some upperclassmen said, “Oh we’ve just been turning the clock back a year.” Turned it back as far as it would go…1969

  • tormeh@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Make a dedicated user on your machine for pirated software. Never give that user root. Should contain it.