• mavedustaine@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, the US has abysmal public transport (at least in houston, tx in my case) compared to even third world countries like Egypt. It’s downright embarrassing.

      • nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        In Egypt, a large part of public transport is from private entities, the people driving the microbus and tok tok own those vehicles. In the west, these services are expected to be funded by the government for some reason

      • doingthestuff@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I live inside the 275 loop around Cincinnati. My work is 11 miles away. In order to get to work via public transit I’d have to walk 3.5 miles to the closest bus stop, take a bus the wrong direction, wait for a transfer to another bus heading closer to work, and then walk 2.5 miles to my job. The schedule is so sparse it would take me 3-4 hrs one way and I’d be walking more than half of it. No bike lanes or sidewalks either, and the roads are so dangerous that in almost 20 years of working there I’ve never seen a bike attempt any of my possible routes. I have seen memorial bikes on the roadside where someone got hit.

    • newIdentity@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I live in Germany and while not perfect, I’m glad we have such a thing.

      The problem is when a 10 minute car drive takes an hour with public transportation

      • Rakn@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Next problem is surge pricing and general ticket prices. I recall one city I was living in a few years back having advertisements for taking the train. And I was like “Yeah sure. It’s just double the price and triple the time”.

        To me taking the train (at least for long distances) is a luxury thing.

    • EnderWi99in@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s largely a problem of government that is exacerbated by the influence of the businesses themselves. It’s the governments job to enact policy change that force business to address these issues and develop more sustainable production process and product offerings, but since the government has essentially been bought out by those same businesses, nothing happens at all.

      We can’t decouple business from government without policy changes that would place limitations on such influence, and we cannot enact those policies because of the influence from businesses. I don’t see a solution unless people wise up and elect a lot of people in the same election cycle not beholden to these groups, but I don’t know how that can be accomplished.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly. Saudi Aramco is wrecking the environment because (among others) Dow Chemical keeps buying their oil. Dow Chemical keeps buying their oil because Sterilite keeps buying the plastic that Dow makes. Sterilite keeps buying Dow’s plastic because people keep buying Sterilite bins to store all their junk. Ultimately if there wasn’t a person consuming things at the end of the chain, the oil wouldn’t be removed from the ground in the first place.

      Ultimately it all comes down to people’s lifestyles. When you buy something that’s made of plastic or transported on a container ship, you’re giving these companies money they use to wreck the environment. If instead of kiwi fruit, you buy melons from an Amish farmer who brought them to market using a horse-drawn carriage, that lifestyle choice has an impact on the environment.

      Having said that, it’s true that companies use lobbying to twist laws in their favour, and use sales and marketing to drive demand for their products. It’s hard to know whether a product you’re buying is damaging to the environment because the companies that damage the environment don’t want you to know and will oppose any law that makes it clearer. It’s hard to choose to purchase a less environmentally destructive item if you don’t know it exists.

      But, it’s just ridiculous bullshit to pretend that nefarious companies are out there burning coal just for fun, while cackling evilly. Everything companies do is in service to making money, and virtually the only way they make money is to sell things that people want to buy.

  • raresbears@iusearchlinux.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Swap your car or plane ride for a bus or train

    Kinda hard to do when there’s nowhere near enough investment in public transit

    • Taxxor@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah where I live, there’s a bus every 2 hours that needs ~30 minutes to get to where I work. If I took that, I’d have to walk an additional 15 minutes to my actual workplace and I’d still be an hour too early.
      And after work, I’d have to again walk 15 minutes to the bus stop and wait another 30 minutes for the bus home.

      So between leaving my house and coming back home, there’d be ~11.5 hours. When I use my car, that’s ~9.5 hours.

      • crdz@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        My old job was located out of the city and the times I worked there were no busses running (4am til whenever we were done) so I drove ~30 minutes to work, then work between 12 to 14 hours then drive back, which can take between 30 minutes to an hour if there was an accident. Then only being able to sleep like 3 hours a night then repeat the process was torture.

        I’m so glad I was able to get a remote job where now I actually have time during my work days to do other things like actually go to gym everyday and be able to see my family more rather than just work and sleep.

  • BottleUpAndExplode@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is one of the most shittiest takes I’ve ever seen, trying to absolve oneselves of taking responsibility.

    Yeah, there are those companies that produce the bad shit but this tweet is right. If you stop eating meat, the companies that produce meat will produce less of it and there will be a real impact.

    I don’t know what the fuck the OP is thinking. Like, do they think that the corporations just produce pollution for fun? No, it’s because you buy that shit. If you stop buying that shit, pollution will go down. CNN was 100% right and that fucker that responded is retarded at best, but probably just braindead because what he posted doesn’t make sense at all.

  • aeternum@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can you imagine what would happen if you… stopped buying those products that those companies are selling that are responsible for the emissions? Nah, that’s crazy talk.