• Pok@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If only there was something more specific that a wider range of people could relate to.

    • Thief_of_Crows@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Something more specific than how humans relate to the temperature? Why would that be useful? If you’re doing science, you should use Celsius. If you’re a regular human being, being affected by temperature, you should use fahrenheit.

      • Pok@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It would be useful because it gives multiple specific and relatable reference points. How is that not useful?

        The way humans relate to the temperature has a huge range and so very vague. Do you say that 0 is when you swap shorts for trousers? Or when you put a hoody on? Or is it when your neighbour puts their hoody on? Or when your friend from Texas puts their hoody on?

        It’s like when you come across a recipe that calls for a knob of butter. Everyone’s knob is a different size, we’ve just agreed to say that whatever it is, it’s enough.

        • Thief_of_Crows@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It doesn’t matter what other people think about the temperature, it only matters what you think. Fahrenheit is useful in the same sense the word Red is useful: you and I could be seeing totally different colors that we call red, but it doesn’t matter because we both point to the same objects as being red.