• BolexForSoup@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 months ago

    Same thing I say when people say “CG is terrible I want practicals.” Folks there are a lot of forgettable - and some memorable for their sheer shittyness - practical effects in Hollywood’s history lol

    • gullible@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      People complain because it doesn’t make sense to use CG for everything. I’m still mad that The Thing 2 still hasn’t offered its original practical cut.

      • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Ok but that’s what bad movies do and good CG you don’t notice! I always use Sicario as an example. It’s a masterclass in knowing what CG can and can’t do, because it’s everywhere in that movie and most people have no clue. Hell the border fence as they drive to the border is all CG.

        • gullible@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          I’m not saying that CG should be avoided but that it doesn’t make sense to use it all the time. And it’s funny, the CG in Sicario was actually what got me interested in landscape alteration in movies. Artists have been able to perfectly craft and rearrange landscapes in CG for a long while. I have no issue with it. Now when you uncannily CG a baby or Robert deniro for 2 hours, my eye twitches.

          • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            I understand what you’re saying, but nobody is saying it should be used all the time, least of all me. I don’t really know what you’re responding to.

            Like any tool it can be used lazily and excessively. I don’t think you’re gonna find a lot of people that disagree with that statement lol