• awwwyissss@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Openly biased website, but I’ll upvote anyway because the article seemed reasonable and I’d like to see at least some political balance on Lemmy.

          • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Yeah I took a quick look too, seems like he’s trying to become a right wing personality. So, mostly likely he wants this to be news whether it’s legit or not.

            Might be interesting to see the data they claim to have spent so many thousands of hours researching. They really lumped some categories of claimed discrepancies together in a way that made me a bit suspicious. Like saying “x number of things on this list of four bullet points” happened. Well… which one happened the most? Maybe the most important thing on the list happened once, and the other ones happened 5,000 times.

            • Neuromancer@lemm.eeM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              Normally they claim the person is a cybersecurity expert and you look at their resume, they work at geek squad.

  • u_die_for_elmer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I’ve found some voting irregularities as well, including but not limited to:

    • its almost impossible to get a 3rd party on the ballot
    • 3rd parities are not involved in the debates
    • nearly unlimited money can be spent on these so-called elections
    • we only get one day to vote in person
    • imprisoned people can’t vote
    • undocumented migrants and refugees can’t vote
    • victims of US imperialism can’t vote
    • we don’t get a vote on the highest court in the land

    the list goes on and on. Conservatives are always focused on the wrong shit, and usually from dubious sources