“So then it’s onboarding people, teaching them how to play D&D, which is really complex”

  • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Stealth is a great example. If you compare the rules involving stealth in Pathfinder 2e and D&D 5e, on the surface, it looks like 5e stealth is simpler to handle. PF2e has a chapter on it, 5e just tells you to roll stealth against passive perception. But the problem is that’s not a complete ruleset, so the DM needs to fill in the gaps, and every DM is going to have their own version of the stealth rules cobbled together from dozens of ad hoc rulings which ultimately ends up being more complicated than if the rulebook just laid it all out to begin with.

    • Lesrid@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      And it’s no surprise the stealth classes in BG3 end up outshining all others in damage potential.

      • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Uuuhhhh… Nah. Multiclass monsters and bug abusers are the top dps. Usually some fighter thief ranger or Taberna brawler barb+ fighter thief or monk fighter thief… You see a pattern here? The more attacks you can do (action surge + extra bonus action) the better.