• mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    They won’t. Windows isn’t even the best way to play Windows games, anymore. x86 itself might become a suggestion - a legacy bytecode for LLVM to consume.

    • Corngood@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      I do agree with you. The current state of things is pretty great.

      I have a phone, laptop, desktop, and steam deck. I control the software that runs on all of them, at least down to the bootloader/kernel. If I want to patch a kernel, I can do it. And aside from the phone, I can probably run the majority of the games that have ever been released (on any platform), on any of them.

      I worry about two things in the future:

      1. Will be able to buy modern hardware without the software it runs being restricted?

      2. Will online services used by software be accessible without hardware based attestation?

      • M500@lemmy.ml
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I have similar worries. I think there will always be some kind of free hardware, but it might be limited to slower arm or risc-v chips. But I doubt there will even be a situation where you can’t have control.

        Your second point is not something I’ve considered, but now I’m worried about it and can totally see that being a thing.

      • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        More services I don’t give a shit about would not be surprising.

        But a lot of these problems have an obvious answer in legislation.