• IndiBrony@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    That’s still on the parents. My little lad is 15 and never had his own phone until his tweens. Amusingly, he was older than me when I got my first phone back in the 90s.

    He never got bullied for not having a phone.

    • ChexMax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      He may not have been bullied, but he may have missed out on bonding and closeness that his peers enjoyed. There was a study that showed life is way better for kids if they don’t have a phone, but only if their peers also don’t have phones

      • hulemy@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        4 months ago

        This fact alone makes me conflicted about this. I don’t want my kids to walk around having phones from an early age, but I know first hand that being excluded as a kid is not a enjoyable experience. And kids are vicious creatures to each other too.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      All I never had was a Gameboy I didn’t get an actual phone until I was in high school.

      It had polyphonic ringtones and an IR blaster, it was the business.

    • Alex@feddit.ro
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      lol people calling 15-year-olds “little lads” makes me feel like a baby

      (i’m 13 :/)