The French government issued a decree Tuesday banning the term “steak” on the label of vegetarian products, saying it was reserved for meat alone.

  • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Photo of it might be of a very generic burger or a sausage. Some even had the word burger or sausage as the biggest print in the box, much bigger than anything else.

    Maybe the fact that you can’t tell the products apart is a sign that there’s some sort of similarity or common denominator between them. If only we had some sort of linguistic function to indicate that two objects are similar.

    It’s not just a personal thing. But obviously considering the reaction and expectation of the people were of a meat product but they got an imitation product. It just seems shady.

    Not to mention in reality the products aren’t very similar but the box and the branding can mislead to think you it was the thing you were hoping to buy. Just seems weird.

    • Exocrinous@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      “Oh no! I was expecting an animal to have been kept in a cage, but instead this is an identical cruelty-free sausage!”

      If it quacks like a duck it’s a duck. If it sauces like a sausage it’s a sausage.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        The consumer expectation would typically be of a meat product and they’re misleading you that that’s what you were buying instead of highlighting what sort of product it actually is. It just seems anti-consumer and like they’re embarrassed of the actual product, to not highlight the fact it’s an imitation product.

        Seems unnecessary. If these are good products you’d think they’d stand on their own.

        • Exocrinous@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Y tho. Why do you care that it’s meat? You know I might be in the minority here, but the reason I eat food is cause it’s nutritious and tastes good. Not because it’s meat.

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            It’s just what people want to buy in this case. Could be familiarity, taste, some other features of the product.

            You know I might be in the minority here, but the reason I eat food is cause it’s nutritious and tastes good. Not because it’s meat.

            I think most consumers have more expectations from products they’re buying that it’s just nutritious. Having expectations on the actual ingredients is very common.

            tastes good

            Usually the products in question taste different from what they’re imitating. That’s one of the issues.

            • Exocrinous@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              I’ve never seen fake meat that looked like meat but didn’t taste like it. Except for when it tasted better. Then again, I may be biased, because I dislike the taste of guilt.

              • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Our building has a lot of vegetarian and vegan families so I got to sample a lot of vegan imitation products. I’ve never tasted one that got it right or very close at all. Mind you, most of them taste good but it’s just nowhere near the same. And imo they needn’t be, could just be its own thing but well, they chose a different path.

                But in any case, the issue is that the consumer thinks they’re buying one thing and get another thing. And the manufacturer in question seems to intentionally be trying to cause that mistake. Just seems shady and unnecessary, since some of these products are fine, even though they’re not the same as the product they were imitating.

                  • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    9 months ago

                    “We’re not trying to trick people by highlighting the confusing term way above a more descriptive ones while we’re creating an imitation product, consumers are just bad at reading.”

                    Sure thing. I bet it’s a total accident. Companies would never try to mislead the consumers after all.