• Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    8 months ago

    How do you know which officer is giving instructions, who they are near, and who heard it?

    In the video, I see at least eight officers, at least 20m away from the vehicle in all directions.

    Who was the one that shot her?

    Is there another source you can reference explaining the details? Because there’s no way anyone could know based on the video and article.

    That said, this is about as American as a police interaction can be.

      • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        8 months ago

        Facts matter. I’m not in the position to defend anyone, as it’s hard to know exactly what happened, even after watching the video several times.

        What matters is the police killed the person they were trying to save.

        When you’re in a situation where bullets are flying from both the “'good” and “bad” guy, innocent victims can, and do, get killed. This happens more often than you’d think, and there isn’t a perfect way to end a situation like this. Everyone’s life is at risk when you’ve got a murderer in a car not willing to surrender.

        The narrative that all those officers, except for one, wanted the KIDNAP VICTIM to be shot and killed is so deranged and incomprehensible outside an American mindset.

        Let’s not lose focus here. The father who kidnapped her is ultimately the one to blame. His actions led to her death.

        • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          The narrative that all those officers, except for one, wanted the KIDNAP VICTIM to be shot and killed is so deranged and incomprehensible outside an American mindset.

          The idea that you have to have wanted something to happen to face consequences for it happening is going to set a lot of folks free from prison though.

          • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            The idea that you have to have wanted something to happen to face consequences for it happening is going to set a lot of folks free from prison though.

            No, because the justice system balances the sentence based on intent. Homicide, 2nd degree murder, 1st degree murder, etc.

            This is why drivers who run over pedestrians often get no jail time, while someone who plows into pedestrians on purpose goes to jail for a long time.

            You could most certainly make a case that the officers could have been negligent, which caused someone to be killed.

            • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Then why is your entire contribution to the thread a deflection of any suggestion of consequences?

              • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Really? I do think there should be accountability and consequences.

                What degree of consequences depends, I guess, on how much animosity one might have towards law enforcement. I don’t think that’s a very balanced way of looking at things.