• Zoboomafoo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The worst part about this dumb ass talking point is that it implies that the Supreme Court is the source of our inalienable rights

    • Rodsterlings_cig@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      By talking point, you mean how the US constitution was written and the whole point of the supreme court?

      Edit: Until congress does their job and pass legislation on these matters, this is unfortunately how the cookie crumbles.

        • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          They’re only declared inherent human rights on the very same sheet of paper that defines the rights and codifies them into law. Without the government backing them, they don’t mean anything and are just words written on a piece of paper.

          • Zoboomafoo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The constitution doesn’t bestow those rights, it just defines how the government interacts with them

        • Rodsterlings_cig@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I agree in principle, but not in totality (largely due to bad faith arguements). Everyone should have the right to privacy and basic essentials, to carry a glock around wherever not so much.