• Ech@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    78
    ·
    1 year ago

    Guess we shouldn’t have any laws about anything, then.

    • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      66
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bit of a leap, my dude.

      Of course we should have laws.

      But for things that are actually harmful.

      For everything else we should have regulation.

      • Ech@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        52
        ·
        1 year ago

        If your single point is “trying to stop people only makes them do it more”, than no, it’s not a “leap”. That invalidates the very idea of having laws in the first place.

        And fwiw, I’m not arguing in favor of this law, just against the idea you replied with.

        • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I just stated a fact, not my opinion on it.

          The leap was you assuming that i think that means there should be no laws. Which, as you can see by my previous response, you were wrong about.

        • Orphie Baby@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          We didn’t say this about everything (although it is true that some kinds of people are attracted to anything forbidden). We said it’s true of teenagers and porn. Duh.

          • Ech@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            We said it’s true of teenagers and porn. Duh.

            I don’t see any such qualifiers. Do you?

            • Orphie Baby@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Semi-Hemi-Demigod said:

              It’s not that. It’s that if you tell a horny teenager that there’s pictures of naked people somewhere they’ll move heaven and earth to get to it.

              • Ech@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I wasn’t responding to them, so how does that matter?

        • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          And fwiw, I’m not arguing in favor of this law, just against the idea you replied with.

          Whatever you’re arguing for or against, you’re arguing like a drunk uncle. You’re taking it to an extreme that it’s obvious no one actually intended, and then arguing against that extreme like it was the original point.

          • Ech@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m not arguing against extremes, I’m arguing against a bad argument. And I’m not drunk, I only wish I were.