Then the OP is pointless. It speaks to employee quality. If that isn’t in any way useful in the context, the question is dumb. It wouldn’t matter how motivated that employee was, so why mention it.
So either quality counts, or layoffs are entirely based on luck, often firing the best of them all. Sounds like you are coping. Quality almost always matters. And the smallest things can save your ass.
Even in a game with odds as bad as the lottery, you still have to play it to win.
In your educated opinion, what are layoffs based on? Can’t be random. So what? Race? Gender? Age? Everything but performance? Because who cares about performance. Just fire someone, Fred. Anyone.
The question is, how good was he at his job? Ambition and loyalty only goes so far.
That’s a dumb question in this context. Mass layoffs are not performance based
Then the OP is pointless. It speaks to employee quality. If that isn’t in any way useful in the context, the question is dumb. It wouldn’t matter how motivated that employee was, so why mention it.
So either quality counts, or layoffs are entirely based on luck, often firing the best of them all. Sounds like you are coping. Quality almost always matters. And the smallest things can save your ass.
Even in a game with odds as bad as the lottery, you still have to play it to win.
In your educated opinion, what are layoffs based on? Can’t be random. So what? Race? Gender? Age? Everything but performance? Because who cares about performance. Just fire someone, Fred. Anyone.