• BombOmOm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I’m a bit disappointed this decision feels wishy-washy and wasn’t reached the day after we confirmed Russia was using Iranian weapons in Ukraine, but at the same time, I’m happy it is happening now. (Best time to plant a tree and all!) I commend both France and Germany for taking this step forward!

    I wonder if this means Germany will finally send cruise missiles to Ukraine. Their basis for holding back was Ukraine might use them to strike targets in Russia, and that cannot be allowed. But now that they are explicitly stating Ukraine can use donated weapons against Russian military targets…

    • Riddick3001@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Their basis for holding back was Ukraine might use them to strike targets in Russia, and that cannot be allowed…

      That was one argument, the other one was that a (German) ground force maintainance crew & training & encoding experts and stuff would be needed. Regarding sending maintainance crews, the opinions seem more and more positive of late. I’ll reckon we’ll might see Taurus , and hopefully more of it’s friends, being send. Then again, it will also depend on the outcome of the ( EU) elections this year.

      • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        French training personnel in country openly, followed by the Baltics (or vice versa) would make the German standpoint harder and harder to maintain.

        While it is an open secret the Brits and French have been in country supporting storm shadow and scalp use.

        So who knows… let’s see if the Germans order another batch of Taurus.

        • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          It doesn’t really matter what other nations do in that regard. The German constitution forbids sending troops without a UN or NATO mandate. it’s one of the post WW2 shackles. Besides that I don’t think Ukraine even has any compatible platforms anyway, the Gripen might be if Sweden goes through with that one.

          But regardless of all that, Taurus should get a new batch order either way to be honest. If there’s only such a limited amount in working condition and they’re this valuable, then we should probably prepare a little more.

      • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Germany needs either a UN or NATO mandate to send troops into Ukraine. Anything else would be unconstitutional.

        • Riddick3001@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Yes, I forgot Germany has a “diehard” constitution. Tnx for explaining this aspect. That would make it a third argument, or need of an " extra A-okay" mandate.

          I also remembered, that big eavesdrop hack scandal while the Taurus issue was internally being discussed with the military brass and ministers. Having that scandal and the discussion " in the open" hasn’t helped either.