• Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Carbon capture, illustrated:

    Eleanor from 'The Good Place' sweeping a large mess under a rug.

    Not to say we shouldn’t try to pull CO2 from the atmosphere, but I just don’t see how we can do that without it also being permission to keep emitting at current levels.

    • futatorius@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      If you look a the physics and engineering challenges of attempting to pull CO2 out of the atmosphere, you’ll very soon reach the conclusion that it’s better to stop CO2 emissions at the source, or to reduce activities that cause CO2 emissions.

      The only people who would rather put pollution into the atmosphere, then spend vast amounts attempting to take it out again, are those whose profits come from selling the oil.

      • delgato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        The technology is here and it is developing at a rapid pace. There are a lot of clever ways to remove CO2. Keep in mind “CDR” - carbon dioxide removal and “CCUS” - carbon capture, utilization & storage are two different approaches to reducing atmospheric CO2 concentrations. CDR includes soil carbon sequestration, bio-char, ocean alkalinity. CUS is storage of supercritical CO2 between the pore space of permeable rock.

    • Adderbox76@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s why industry people keep yelling about it, even though some very large scale attempts at it were already failures.

      They’ll keep pushing the scam for the same reason we all have to use paper straws; misdirection.