jeffw@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agoAI trained on photos from kids’ entire childhood without their consentarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square69fedilinkarrow-up1458arrow-down110cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1448arrow-down1external-linkAI trained on photos from kids’ entire childhood without their consentarstechnica.comjeffw@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square69fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squareDkarma@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14arrow-down16·5 months agoLol the idea that you need consent to look at someone’s publicly posted pictures is laughably wrong.
minus-squareEmmy@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21·5 months agoView is not the same as “use in a commercial enterprise to turn a profit”. Only a fool would think that’s the same thing.
minus-squareocassionallyaduck@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·5 months agoThis. Anyone can view content online. Training a visual model off those images requires feeding those images into a model, and that is not the terms under which you originally viewed them. It’s why OpenAI is currently facing tons of lawsuits it may legitimately lose in court. Probably not though, they can just settle and pay a fee. Deep pockets.
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·5 months agoYou’re allowed to video tape in public for profit. Do we consider paying photos online to be public?
minus-squareEmmy@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·5 months agoYou’re allowed to take videos in public, yes. but someone can’t then steal that video and use it for just any purpose. There’s a clear distinction
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·5 months agoIt’s more like it you put it on your porch and say “free take a copy”.
Lol the idea that you need consent to look at someone’s publicly posted pictures is laughably wrong.
View is not the same as “use in a commercial enterprise to turn a profit”. Only a fool would think that’s the same thing.
This. Anyone can view content online.
Training a visual model off those images requires feeding those images into a model, and that is not the terms under which you originally viewed them.
It’s why OpenAI is currently facing tons of lawsuits it may legitimately lose in court.
Probably not though, they can just settle and pay a fee. Deep pockets.
You’re allowed to video tape in public for profit. Do we consider paying photos online to be public?
You’re allowed to take videos in public, yes. but someone can’t then steal that video and use it for just any purpose.
There’s a clear distinction
It’s more like it you put it on your porch and say “free take a copy”.