At last, someone from the world of politics is being honest about a pervasive and harmful trade-off. When home prices rise faster than earnings, owners like me gain wealth, while non-owners lose because their incomes fall further behind housing costs.

Honesty is saying that home prices have to fall. But this is progress.

The Generation Squeeze folks have recommendations.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean the solution is pretty clear. Establish residency requirements, and significantly increase taxes on places that aren’t used as primary residences.

    • TemporaryBoyfriend@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve been telling this to anyone who will listen…

      At the federal level, any income, personal or corporate, from property rentals or short term rental of any single family residental property is taxed at the highest marginal rate, PLUS a surcharge of 1%, increasing at 2x the rate of inflation every year. All taxes raised from the surcharge go to federal housing programs.

      At the provincial level, any property that isn’t your primary residence gets taxed at 1% of the total property value. The tax rate increases at 2x the rate of inflation every year. All taxes raised go to provincial housing programs, including rebates for first time home buyers.

      At the municipal level, cities should be able to tax any property used as a short term rental at whatever rate they feel is fair. Also, any vacant property is taxed at least double the provincial rate.

      This immediately stops individuals and companies from investing in single family residential properties, forces individuals and companies to divest their residential property portfolio as they become unprofitable as the tax rates increase, and slowly creates a steady flow of residential homes onto the market. It shouldn’t create a housing crash, it should stop and slowly reverse the upward trend of housing over the course of 5 to 10 years.

      Please steal this idea.

    • sbv@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not sure if you mean “residency” as in residents of Canada, or residency as in living in the property.

      Assuming it’s the former: Removing some investors from the pool of buyers would probably help a bit, but I’m not sure it would have a significant impact outside of a few markets.

      Assuming it’s the latter: NB taxes non-primary residences at a higher rate and has still seen significant price growth.

    • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      The vast majority of the money being made is being made by single home owners who live in the property. Until you start dealing with that, nothing will change.

      • TemporaryBoyfriend@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You deal with that by flattening the upward trend (or even reversing it a little) by adding more inventory. Corporate ownership of residential housing is a big thing, as is owning second and third homes as investment properties. My upstairs neighbour with a middle-management job and a stay at home wife owns the largest suite in my building, plus two rental condos. It’s way, way more common than you think.

        • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Corporate/multi-unit ownership isn’t higher today than it was 20 years ago, it’s actually 5-6% lower than it was 50 years ago. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/nhs-enm/2011/as-sa/99-014-x/2011002/c-g/c-g01-eng.cfm

          People love easy scapegoats they can point at instead of themselves, it’s so nice to point out the evil corporations and multi-home owners and don’t get me wrong they aren’t helping, but they are not the driving force behind our problems.

            • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              What does that have to do with anything I said? Airbnb is a small fraction of all units and counted in my ownership as not owner occupied. We build more new units per year than airbnb units exist in total.