Rule 4: Do not promote or put drugs/alcohol/tobacco/weed/psychedelics/inhalants in a positive light.
Some comrades mentioned in private channels that weed is not addictive, I’m not going to argue on this point because this is a fundamental divide between China and some western countries.
My view is that whether you’re addicted to them or not, you shouldn’t promote these substances or put them in a positive light. It’s fine if you don’t agree with me, but anyone who leaves a comment here arguing the opposite will be banned from the community (30 days for now).
If a lot of people oppose this rule, either by downvotes and/or number of comments, I will willingly step down as moderator of this community.
hexbear doesn’t have downvotes. seems weird to preemptively make a rule when we’re not going to change or productively debate chinese drug policy and weed/shrooms/lsd/whatever aren’t part of any capitalist plots to re-run opium.
are you ideologically anti-drug like middle-aged white americans or is the motivation here about respecting the history and material conditions that caused china to be how it is?
This is the /c/China community on Lemmygrad.ml, not hexbear.net.
the no-downvotes includes federated posts even if the instance has them
One solution is for someone from hexbear to comment that they’re against this new rule, and then people from hexbear can upvote that comment.
i doubt we’re particularly fussed about the rule, i mostly commented because i’m broadly interested in the philosophy of moderation
Indeed, there should be a defined process for the introduction of new rules in a community, maybe in the form of suggestions, or when an incident requiring moderation occurred that wasn’t covered by the rules. My next step might be making a post to receive suggestions for community rules, though /c/China isn’t a particularly active community so there hasn’t been many rule violations.