• CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 year ago

    the human component of the famine is disputed by (even liberal) historians to this day. Wikipedia, as an encyclopedia promoting a No point-of-view policy, should not be so strict on classifying the famine like this in the very opening paragraph. Additionally it’s accepted that non-human factors played into the famine, so it’s also wrong to imply the famine was strictly man-made.

    Unless they mean man-made to say that the kulaks burned their grain, but somehow I doubt that. Still, it does raise a question of ambiguity: who was responsible for the man-made factor? In my opinion, this should then be left out of the opening paragraph because it can confuse the reader, and developed in the article.

    • jackmarxist [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      There were many factors

      1. Natural factors because the year of the famine was not good for crops.

      2. Kulak factor resulted in destruction of crops and farm animals.

      3. Government incompetence in calculations and policy favouring cities over rural areas.

      Keep in mind that once Collectivisation was in full effect, the famine situation in the USSR improved drastically.