• misterundercoat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    3 months ago

    a proposal that has not yet been accepted by the Harris campaign.

    Not confirmed by the Harris campaign or Fox News at this point. Why are we reporting Trump’s garbage social media spew as factual?

  • LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    You mean the propaganda network who just couple of days ago said “if you are a man who vote for women, you have transitioned into women? IT’S SCIENCE”

    WOW, what a great venue for “debate”!

  • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    It fucking sucks that the Democrats keep bending over backwards for this shitbag. Why does he get to pick the venue?

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      81
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      He doesn’t. Harris campaign has not responded. This is just Trump’s wishful thinking.

      Edit: Headline misleads with the phrase “agrees to.” That suggests that there has been an “agreement” between the two parties. There has not. This is Trump’s “proposal.”

      Trump Proposes a Fox News Debate …

    • Carrolade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m not so sure. You’re right that nobody “debates” Trump, but you do get to get onstage and launch attacks at him if you’re smooth and know what you’re doing.

      Fox being the venue is a little meh though, I agree the questions will probably have a strong slant.

      • Railing5132@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        The questions would have a slant like a sheer fucking cliff. The audience would be hand picked by MAGA, Inc. There would be absolutely no gain to a “debate” on fox “news”.

        • Carrolade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Usually things like audience representation and format are negotiated by the two campaigns before the debate is fully agreed to.

          I think it’s a rare chance to reach the Fox audience with things they don’t often encounter due to their media bubbles.

  • IndiBrony@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    “Man being assassinated drives knife into own stomach”

    I bet he can’t make himself look good even on home turf at this point.

      • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 months ago

        Fox won’t do that to him. For every overtime ramble nothing would happen. They’d shorten Harris’ response times to make up for it “for the sake of time”. And of course no fact checking and lob up easy questions for him with hard convoluted questions for her and no overtime allowed. I wouldn’t put it beyond them to interrupt her mid answer or just switch to Trump when he does one of his interruption “tactics”.

  • SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    My only concern is when she gets flustered sometimes she blurts something out off the dome that she really shouldn’t. The line about not trusting a vaccine from the Trump admin in 2020 comes to mind immediately - very kneejerk, poorly considered response.

    Trump is allowed to make 100 of these a minute. By virtue of being a woman of color she isn’t. It’s fucked but it’s true. She really, really needs to avoid that kind of response. He’s on a temper tantrum right now and she looks like the adult in the room. It’s one of her best strengths going into this election and she needs to protect that image.

    • LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Same goes for any woman of color. Right relentlessly attacked Fani Willis and slandered her all over for being in a relationship with a divorced man - at the same time nominating a convicted rapist and serial cheater to be their party leader.

      Hypocrisy is their brand. It is up to us - those who are not in a cult - to reject these attacks and not allow mainstream media to run with them. FUCK THE PROPAGANDA AND VOTE.

  • NocturnalEngineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    For a cable network, which by their own admission is an “entertainment” show and no “reasonable viewer” would take them seriously…

    Why are they even allowed to host political debates?

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    The DNC desire for “debate” will never be anything but incredible to me. Why? Why, DNC?

    “Swing voters”? “Outlining of policies”? “Reasoned discussion”?

    Trump has murdered all of these things. In front of your faces. Many times!

    Just . . . Don’t.

    • krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      They still think facts and reason matter more to people than gut feelings and peer pressure.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        They don’t understand the modern GQP is very literally a cult, with the attendant cult mindset. “Debate” is just performative vitriol in their eyes.