The couple added that they were “horrified” that a large corporation like Uber could “avoid being sued in a court of law by injured consumers because of contractual language buried in a dozen-page-long user agreement concerning services unrelated to the one that caused the consumers’ injuries.”

After several days and countless news stories surrounding Disney’s bid to use Disney+ terms to shield itself from a lawsuit tied to Disney World, the Hollywood giant later backtracked and dropped the legal claim, allowing the matter to proceed in court instead of through arbitration.

  • eacapesamsara@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    They chose to be born in a country where corporations have been writing laws and installing judges for longer than there’s been electricity, better luck next life I guess since I doubt this will get anyone involved to change their voting habits to third party.