Since it looks like Firefox might not be a good option for the long haul due to some disappointing decisions from its management, I’m on the lookout for privacy-friendly alternatives. I came across Cromite, which is based on Chromium and has an ad blocker. Has anyone tried it? From what I’ve seen, the built-in ad blocker seems pretty basic and not very customizable. Still, I think any alternative we choose should be based on Chromium, especially if we don’t want to wait ages for Ladybird.

  • WeAreAllOne@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    The ones that you refer to is for them to make money. Ok so why is that bad? Do you pay to use their browser? No. Are they funded by Google like Mozilla is? No. Does this tactic interfere with your browsing since you can disable these shit? No.

    I’m not defending Brave at all but one should be criticizing objectively.

    Ladybird is at least 2 years out from any production version. And they still have funding I think.

    So comparing all browser I believe they least shit is Brave. Librewolf is fine too and in terms of speed it’s not that far behind and in real life no one will give a shit or even notice. It all comes down to usability in the browsing experience.

    • asudox@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Justifying url injections for money? Ads are one thing, but anyone that knew that their browser was “secretly” injecting stuff into the url would be creeped the hell out. I don’t see how this browser is private at all.

      • WeAreAllOne@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It was injecting specific urls when one was using their crypto shit. The got caught and corrected it. Again, not saying this is justified but among the others I find Brave the least shit. It’s the only browser that can trick effectively coveryourtracks.eff.org