Dearborn is home to one of the largest concentrations of Arab Americans and has traditionally been a Democratic stronghold. But this year that all changed.
They should’ve voted for democrats, who also love genocide. Seriously, the only “leopards ate my face” I see are democrats insisting on supporting genocide and then predictably losing support from voters. These voters were just desperate for any possibility of change, no matter how slim. This is understandable when the change they were hoping for was to not have a president that supported genocide. This doesn’t deserve mockery, no matter how misguided.
The “better choice” argument is used by democrats to follow republicans deeper and deeper into the right wing because as long as democrats are slightly less fascist, they’re technically the “better choice”. Now we’re at the point where democrats are full-throatedly supporting genocide. You know, something that literal nazis are known for. Put that in your notes.
"Seriously, the only “leopards ate my face” I see are democrats insisting on supporting genocide and then predictably losing support from voters. These voters were just desperate for any possibility of change, no matter how slim. This is understandable when the change they were hoping for was to not have a president that supported genocide. "…
Sounds like you are supportive of the alternative to Harris despite there being ample evidence that that alternative supports genocide more actively than Harris.
I can vote for them while criticizing their support for genocide and their generally idiotic political strategy. The other party being worse doesn’t change this.
They should’ve voted for democrats, who also love genocide. Seriously, the only “leopards ate my face” I see are democrats insisting on supporting genocide and then predictably losing support from voters. These voters were just desperate for any possibility of change, no matter how slim. This is understandable when the change they were hoping for was to not have a president that supported genocide. This doesn’t deserve mockery, no matter how misguided.
So the better choice was the guy endorsed by literal nazis, who are known for… checks notes their genocidal inclinations?
The “better choice” argument is used by democrats to follow republicans deeper and deeper into the right wing because as long as democrats are slightly less fascist, they’re technically the “better choice”. Now we’re at the point where democrats are full-throatedly supporting genocide. You know, something that literal nazis are known for. Put that in your notes.
Thanks to you and people like you the genocide will increase and even speed up and spread out
How? I voted for Harris. It was the democrats who supported genocide and then lost against a clown for the second time.
Could a put that in your first post. It reads like you didnt
How would adding who I voted for change my first post?
"Seriously, the only “leopards ate my face” I see are democrats insisting on supporting genocide and then predictably losing support from voters. These voters were just desperate for any possibility of change, no matter how slim. This is understandable when the change they were hoping for was to not have a president that supported genocide. "… Sounds like you are supportive of the alternative to Harris despite there being ample evidence that that alternative supports genocide more actively than Harris.
I can vote for them while criticizing their support for genocide and their generally idiotic political strategy. The other party being worse doesn’t change this.