“Boulder police are investigating the traffic signs as criminal tampering.”

“I appreciate the fact that it’s drawing attention to the fact that we’d like people to slow down and not be on their phones, but there’s probably, again, a few more appropriate ways about getting that message out.”

I’d love if they implemented whatever appropriate ways they have… then again they said appropriate, not effective.

  • j4k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    There is probably some legality involved. Signs have more than informative meaning, where not pursuing this officially has broader ramifications.

    Just the unauthorized visual distraction factor can be used as a means of argument in court until the matter has precedent in case law established.

    • ericbomb@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      See if that was actually a standard for driving, I’d understand.

      But we have billboards, decorations, floppy men, people dancing on the side of the roads.

      If all that is allowed, I can’t really be offended by a sign saying “don’t kill people” as a form of protest.

      • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        We have fucking digital billboards in my town which is basically an outdoor TV. It is so bright at night it can light up the street. It’s way too distracting to have on a roadway, people get distracted trying to to watch a full advertisement. The ads are similar to how fast food menus are constantly changing and showing close ups of food and deals. This should 100% be illegal next to a roadway, hell they are diatracting enough inside the store sometimes.

        • ericbomb@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Ugh that probably kills night vision of drivers.

          It’s so annoying that even with obvious safety changes we can’t get people on board. Like just getting people to not have overly bright lights that blind folks some how is so hard, when that seems so simple.

          • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            The worst about this particular sign is it switches between dark colors and bright colors, which seems to make the blinding light even worse and more distracting. Somehow a company’s right to advertise is more important than safety, even admist a crackdown on distracted driving. Only the phone screen is bad i guess? Cantdo anything about outdoor signs or auto manufacturers putting ipads into the dash.

    • finderscult@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Legal counter point, I can put up literally any sign on my property. In most states I can put up nearly any sign on public property without permission. See: any flyer stapled to a phone pole or any political sign on a corner.

      The actual case here is the fact they tampered with public property without permission by permanently affixing their sign to the pole. Which is at most a fine.