• AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I don’t know if she went into rationale, but this may be part of it. It’s only certain congressmen who are offended and they will be re-offended every time she joins them in the restroom. I’d expect this is a great way to get them to change their mind by making them uncomfortable that they got what they wanted.

    Also perhaps she wants to do the job she was elected for rather than bicker over which bathroom she personally should use

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      they’re not offended by her bathroom attendance. they’re offended by her existence. bowing down to their fascism won’t change that. she’s a representative; she represents trans people too. extremely disheartening that she just takes jim crow bullshit.

      imagine if rashida tlaib would go “I won’t object to Israeli government’s actions” because she was censured for doing so. she’s the first Palestinian American in congress, after all.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        they’re not offended by her bathroom attendance. they’re offended by her existence.

        Exactly. Now she’ll exist in their bathroom as a regular reminder. For whatever reason they’re uncomfortable, she’ll be reminding them in a regular basis, rather than that be something that just happens somewhere else.

        imagine if rashida tlaib ….

        Is a flawed analogy. You’re giving an example of giving up without repercussions. That’s very different. This could easily be a malicious compliance scenario.

        • pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I don’t even know what you’re imagining here. what do you mean reminder? they’re talking about trans people 24/7 already. they’re not uncomfortable either. this is just performative.