A 30ft tall, 1ft diameter cylinder is about 667,199 cm3. Made of tungsten, it would be 13,343.99 kg, or 13 metric tons. In 1995 the price per metric ton of tungsten was $20,674.11 after adjusting for inflation, or $268,763.43 for the entire rod.
Please check my math on this if you like, as I am very sleep deprived.
But the point is, it is well within the payload capacity of the tech we had, and the military budget. And the U.S. military would have absolutely been willing and able to hijack a ride on a shuttle, when the shuttle program was active.
Take what I said with a massive grain of salt though. Even if I didn’t oops a digit, the number of launches the military could have hijacked for this is very limited, and the number of them very limited.
If there are any in orbit, I’d wager its less than a dozen or so.
The space shuttle had a 60ft long bay, with a LEO payload capacity of 27,500 kg to LEO, 16,050 kg to the ISS, or 10,890 kg to geostationary orbit.
https://www.nasa.gov/reference/the-space-shuttle/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle
Tungsten has a density of 19.254 g/cm3
A 30ft tall, 1ft diameter cylinder is about 667,199 cm3. Made of tungsten, it would be 13,343.99 kg, or 13 metric tons. In 1995 the price per metric ton of tungsten was $20,674.11 after adjusting for inflation, or $268,763.43 for the entire rod.
https://www.metalary.com/tungsten-price/
Please check my math on this if you like, as I am very sleep deprived.
But the point is, it is well within the payload capacity of the tech we had, and the military budget. And the U.S. military would have absolutely been willing and able to hijack a ride on a shuttle, when the shuttle program was active.
Nah, too lazy to check the math, but ill stand corrected. Thanks, i hate it!
Fucking mood.
Take what I said with a massive grain of salt though. Even if I didn’t oops a digit, the number of launches the military could have hijacked for this is very limited, and the number of them very limited.
If there are any in orbit, I’d wager its less than a dozen or so.