Your quoted segments clearly reference the different criteria (10 acres versus 2.2).
And the word “Michigan” appears exactly once in the article: in the second bit you quoted where it clearly refers to the lake.
Your quoted segments clearly reference the different criteria (10 acres versus 2.2).
And the word “Michigan” appears exactly once in the article: in the second bit you quoted where it clearly refers to the lake.
What? Where does it say that?
Also, The article mentions Lake Michigan, not the state
They do. If Minnesota and Wisconsin used similar criteria, Minnesota would have something like 40k more.
https://www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/news/which-has-more-lakes-minnesota-or-wisconsin/
Wisconsin counts large puddles as lakes. If they used the same criteria as Minnesota, they’d have significant fewer than Minnesota.
But I have no holes to poke in your potato statement. Fuck Idaho.
Yeah, South Carolina is definitely not associated with slavery…
I miss having large and active subreddits for the sports teams I follow. They were my primary source of news for the teams and game day threads were great.
I don’t think I’ll lose much sleep worrying that these predictions estimate that, at worst, we’ll see 80% of nominal production this winter. That’s basically noise as far as seasonal variation is concerned.