3 to 5 on average
I think it’s a speech thing that got written down, but then also written as the number instead of the word.
Like they use of the word “one” like this:
That’s one weird thing to do.
That’s a weird thing to do.
So I read that as:
averages 3-5 passengers
averages a 3-5 passengers
averages one 3-5 passengers
averages 1 3-5 passengers
Start with 1
Nowadays the patch notes read “various bugfixes and stability improvements”. That’s the whole note.
Well, I could suspend my disbelief considering they are usually in a life or death situation and adrenaline being a thing that makes people do incredible feats.
Everybody knows you run faster with a knife
Neat! I kept using du and df and work my way to the culprit. On PC’s with GNOME I use baobab.
My PC has a tpm, the CPU is simply on the unsupported list.
How do you indicate going right with your left hand? Here you extend your arm in the direction you want to go.
Just looked it up to check and it’s in the “wegcode” (traffic law), artikel 12.4 and 13.
That’s simply a matter of numbers. More people = more content, but people can’t seem to get past the fewer content so they don’t join/stay.
That also exists in the US under libel. You can’t say anything you want if it harms someone, unless I’m mistaken.
They’re the same, and one requires you to jump though hoops to install. OTOH Edge has rounded corners on the viewport which is weird as shit. And that dumb side bar…
Some people are into that
I’ve always watered the top because a recipe had it as a step and now I know why 😄
If you weren’t wondering about the method of obtaining the data in the meme, you might want to reflect on why.
Literally what started this chain of replies, me asking how one gets these numbers. I learned how Americans come to these numbers now, I just feel there’s some hostility in some of the replies simply for not knowing how something works but wanting to learn. It was simply the comment where I again saw someone mention numbers and now I really wanted to know where the numbers originated. I could have asked the same question in a top comment but I think the place where I asked is kinda irrelevant.
In my country voting is anonymous, how would anyone know based on their sex or color or whatever how anyone voted. Here, your vote is considered private so asking a person how they voted as they walk out the polling station is just a foreign concept to me.
What’s even weirder is how you came to your conclusions. You really have to explain the mental gymnastics you used, because you’re really coming out of nowhere.
How are you installing this package?
I download the PKGBUILD and run makepkg on it. In this case I would edit the PKGBUILD and run makepkg again.
Seems trivial, but I understand there’s an error in the PKGBUILD that should be fixed on the AUR so others don’t have to manually fix it, too.
I’m not familiar with the concept of an exit poll. I will look it up.
How would you know it’s 52%? Isn’t voting anonymous?
I can totally follow that logic. 1 and 3/5ths, rounding up to 2 for the next hypothesis. Very plausible explanation.