• 8 Posts
  • 22 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: September 5th, 2023

help-circle














  • KirbyProton@feddit.uktomemes@lemmy.worldThen and now
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s just such a common misconception that there was no ads in the ‘old Internet’, that’s all I was pointing out. There seems to be a nostalgic false memory that Internet back then didn’t have ads which is hilarious if you were there to see what it was like



  • KirbyProton@feddit.uktomemes@lemmy.worldThen and now
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    What are you talking about, ads were far worse back in the 90s /2000. Were you even using the Internet back then? Couldn’t block them and things like infinite pop ups were rampant, if you didn’t have a firewall setup and anti virus, your entire Windows 98 setup could be wrecked in minutes just being online




  • KirbyProton@feddit.uktoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.worldYup
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This view kinda confuses me, I’m not a landlord don’t worry! If people can’t afford a house then what are they expected to do? It’s all well and good saying if you can’t afford the repairs then you shouldn’t be a landlord but if you can’t afford a house, what then, does the same sentiment apply?

    It seems to me it’s very much a problem with the ‘system’ . Aiming your hate at landlords in general makes no sense when they aren’t the reason you don’t own a house in the first place. Obviously some people do take advantage of others, that’s not what I mean.

    What is the solution here?

    If I could wave a magic wand, I’d limit the number of houses people could own and how much wealth any 1 person could have…

    But the problem still stands, people need enough money to get a house in the first place… So how does that work?