why should he have to do the research to prove you’re acting in good faith? I mean yeah, he was a bit antagnostic, but you literally came in saying that Harris abandoned the left with absolutely nothing to say to back yourself up.

Also the one other comment you made in this thread was to intimate that Harris was making pornographic films. It’s…not a good look.

No. We are not going to pretend this didn’t happen.

You have called me a pedophile, you have called me a bigot, a homophobe and a sexual abuse enabler. Your behaviour has been frankly disgusting and unwarranted and you are going to apologise for that before any discussion continues from this point.

I do mean this very sincerely: Please seek help.

I am not right wing. I am not erasing asexuals. I I’m literally a grey demi ace.

The fact that you literally cannot conceive of someone interprting a literal thousand year old myth differently from you without not only demonising them, but creating an entire structure around it is severely worrying.

I’m saying his sexuality is the cause of him telling Ameinias to kill himself.

That didn’t happen but it’s rather telling you think that aroaces run around telling people to kill themselves.

You’re still attributing sexuality to trauma. That is not how this works. Aromanticism and Asexuality are innate sexualities, what you are describing is literally a trauma response.

This is the same sort of nonsense that had people believing lesbianism was due to a “bad man”

Aromantic people are not sociopaths. It looks like you *think *you’re being an ally or supportive, but you’re actually being extremely offensive and abusive

what on earth does that have to do with your belief he’s aroace.

Do you think aroace people are such due to trauma and abuse? You sound incredibly erasing.

amazingly confident in incorrectness.

Narcissus wasn’t put to death. His own self-absorption killed him.

I think I read that a bullock dray drowned in a rather large puddle at the corner of collins and elizabeth in the 1800’s

Maybe leave comedy to the professionals.

SO! fun fact ,my family actually helped found adelaide. And yeah, it was known as the “city of churches” from the earliest days due the fact it was comprised entirely of free settlers of many faiths - and each one had its own place of worship. It was also unusually (for the time) permissive in regards to worship.

Does this still hold in a secular age? maybe not. But Jesus ain’t still roaming fucking bethlehem and it still holds association.

If they have never been there but know it as “city of churches”, is that not an association?

Looking at the article it’s explicitly talking about Jewish American organised crime groups and their efforts against antisemitism in the prewar period, particularly the notorious Abner Zwillman so I’m not sure exactly what you think you are doing here. They are literally talking about Jewish American mobsters.