As a woman who works in computer science, mansplaining is a very real phenomenon.
As a woman who works in computer science, mansplaining is a very real phenomenon.
Infinite monkeys. Any probability greater than zero times infinity is infinity. You will see an infinite number of monkeys hitting A and an infinite number hitting B. If there were a finite number of monkeys, you would be correct, but that is not the case.
And now we’re at a point where if social media sites take steps to reduce political content, the addicts scream censorship heh
To my knowledge, people close to the borders where propaganda can effectively reach are already quite aware that their government is a joke. They’re just stuck there.
Hey now, I’ve been to the post office…within the last two years or so.
That’s Butte and Yolo for me.
Knowing Elon, you’d think he’d have just called it something stupid like BroPilot to get around that
Block button: a thing that exists.
Goodbye.
Someone’s sarcasm detector is broken.
True, apologies. You can do this some places in the US I should say.
You can do that in the US*. My ex had to do it when her dad stole her ballot in 2016 and voted for Trump.
We got the last laugh, though. He was a massive anti masker and then died of COVID. Wasn’t really that funny though…just sad all around.
*Edit to add - some places in the US
Wtf? Why am I benefiting most under Harris? Shouldn’t that be the guys on the very bottom?
I mean, I’ll take it, but…weird?
(also fuck Trump, he can eat dirty diapers)
Life in general will be fine. We’ve had many mass extinctions that kill off 95% of all life, but life…life finds a way.
Of course, humans won’t be in the 95%, and a lot of animals are going to needlessly die, so womp womp…
Let’s see Voyager load up Chrome real quick
Uh huh…
No, Oppenheimer was a…“communist”!! 😱😱😱😱
Jesus Christ.
That graph is interesting. When was Reagan president again…?
So this is stupid and goofy to even mention, but wouldn’t the ō turn the o sound into a long vowel a la フェムボウイ instead of フェムボイ? Lol sorry…
I could have worded that better. Any probability with a non-zero chance of occurring will occur an infinite number of times given an infinite sequence.
To address the comment you linked, I understand what you’re saying, but you’re putting a lot of emphasis on something that might as well be impossible. In an infinite sequence of coin flips, the probability of any specific outcome - like all heads - is exactly zero. This doesn’t mean it’s strictly impossible in a logical sense; rather, in the language of probability, it’s so improbable that it effectively “never happens” within the probability space we’re working with. Theoretically, sure, you’re correct, but realistically speaking, it’s statistically irrelevant.