You aren’t supposed to do serious work over these things. They should be a last resort imo.

In the article they call it “too big to fail for the crypto economy”

Breathing considered harmful.

Better than nothing, since dead people can’t seek help. It’s always best to fight the source of the problem, but until that’s achieved you should fight the symptoms. The only 2 downsides ich can think about is that a solution for symptoms can make people more reckless and some people might fear the cost. But neither should be a consideration compared to the life of someone.

I played some fantastic games for less than 4$.

I have had proton stuff run better than native. But it was probably a shitty native build.

Do you have a source for that claim?

Neither of the C’s stand for cryptography and they don’t even require a blockchain, but can use one.

I have read somewhere that some text can be compressed incredibly efficiently in some AI models. The issue being that the compressed data is worthless without the model and power to recover it.

I mean you could also increase the error correction rate without increasing the company logo size.

The cheapest printer is the one you already own.

Feminism is good, but radical anything is bad. Thats like saying its misandry to speak out against the manosphere.

I had a poodle mix and the nice thing is they don’t shed their fur on their own. Which also helps with allergies.

Faster things that don’t use much more power can be more power efficient with “race to idle”.

I have that on my tablet with most usb c cables. Anker cables are especially bad. And my ikea cable works perfectly.

We do a bit of pension fraud

This doesn’t feel like something that should happen. Like at all. I don’t want experience repairing stuff. I want stuff not breaking. I know mos tpeople here treat a OS like a hobby, but for most people its a tool.

Thats true, but that sadly won’t help against a state forcing a company to put these things into the silicon. Not saying they do rn, but its a real possibility.

I mean can’t they just audit a version that doesn’t have a backdoor/snoops. Verifying against silicon is probably very hard.

How do you want to verify a RISC core not doing something funny?