Isn’t “The superman is real, and he’s American” a direct quote from the novel? Or at least one of those “additional blurbs” written from the perspective of the first Nightwing, unsure if those were “bonus content” or if there are versions of the novel with just the comics.

Spoilers yadda yadda

Is it really controversial to say “framing superman as the threat we need to unite the world against to stop nuclear armageddon” is a better plotline than “I’m going to make it look like aliens attacked us, but in the goofiest way possible, with a plot device necessitating the existence of real psychics in a world that hitherto otherwise seemed to only have Dr. Manhattan as a genuine “otherworldly force””? Reading the graphic novels really threw me for a loop when that scheme was explained, lol.

Most power generation is just steam spinning turbines. Solar’s just weird. Wind cuts out the steam loop.

The worst thing is, no matter how deep the Russian ties go, it’s to their benefit to flaunt it. It’s not like anyone that voted for him cares, and driving anyone with two brain cells insane is just 2016 all over again.

That argument works for like, Pringles, not something you generally are legally required to have. If they’re required to spend money on advertising just to remain competitive, that sounds like you could severely restrict all insurance company’s ability to spend on advertising and save everyone money.

It’s funny that, despite having zero idea what either of you are talking about, I knew you’d be a .ml account?

Microsoft: your computer, my choice

It’s not like the right is particularly unified on message, it just doesn’t bother them quite as much as long as their sports team is winning.

It will be hilarious to see republican men complaining about women staying abstinent as a direct result of their attacks on women’s rights.

I envy your optimism in choosing years instead of months.

They do not have a voice if you silence them personally to you. They hold no value.

They hold some value when their vote is why we’re having to even entertain this as a possibility.

If only it were possible to make points without inventing goofy and easily ridiculed scenarios.

There are well defined lines at which supporting the government would not be supporting a stable democracy. Project 2025 has enumerated several of them.

I would certainly love to not see a single one of them come up. I plan to be disappointed.

They all get to share the blame. What are you even trying to say? “Damn guys, I voted for hitler but it’s okay he won by more than a single vote so I didn’t even matter”

The main difference between a prime minister and a president is the fact that they’re appointed, not elected, no? Little difference when you consider the state of national primaries in the states, but still.

Their face looks like “you know, I was going to murder you, but I’m just gonna see how long you keep this up for until you realize.

As much as I hate being a corporate shill: ask yourself this. Is the game worth the asking price with no DLC? You don’t have to buy every DLC, that’s just the cost of the additional game development time. And maybe the game isn’t worth the price now, but in two years you can probably pick it and a few of the best DLCs up for the same price as it is now and get your money’s worth.

To be fair, in that world body armor seems to be both commonplace and extremely effective.

I quantify it as: Taylor might not deserve the guillotine, the rest inarguably do.

How often does a solution need “new” code and not “basically the same code as a previous issue but with two small details changed”? This is a genuine question, I have only ever coded as a hobby. But 25% of your work being essentially just copy pasted sounds plausible, and that’s sorta all LLMs are doing, right?