Izeland

That’s almost a banger line, not the person you’re replying to but what do you mean?

What about Rick Mucucci?

It does, and I get disappointed every time I read about it

All comes from PIE

The explanation being?

It’s just good sense to cover your bases by getting both

I’m all for them getting their just desserts, but not at the cost of women suffering

They recently had a deal with Google, so not soon I guess

Love both the usernames here

Rodents then?

There’s literally a saying to pretend until you succeed

That’s not heterophobic.

The straights are not right OTOH

They could have a small microwave

Not the first bot I have seen, but the first one promoting sex related services

Don’t we all, though I’m not opposed to any good liquor

This was back in 2022: https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/identity-security/why-google-now-uses-post-quantum-cryptography-for-internal-comms

But from what I understand Google claims to have rolled out an algorithm to Chrome users, I can’t find the original article which lead to my first response to you, but this seems not too far from it

I thought we already had post quantum encryption, or at least that’s what some articles I read claimed

That said, I hate it since so much of it is dependent on a single device that can generally be opened by just applying REDACTED to the screen and doing REDACTED to narrow down the lock code significantly.

Would that work with my pin which is the equivalent of 40483770487025502574448? Or is a password better?

I think a pin like that is harder to remember for people, and even to get it using fingerprints is difficult because you cover a lot of the numbers giving false information

I would date them so we can amaze people about the amount of movies and shows we haven’t watched combined.